On 6/10/19 9:11 PM, Alex Elder wrote: > On 6/10/19 5:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:53 PM Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Add the binding definitions for the "qcom,ipa" device tree node. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml | 180 ++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 180 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..0037fc278a61 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qcom,ipa.yaml >>> @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@ >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> >> New bindings are preferred to be dual GPL-2.0 and BSD-2-Clause. But >> that's really a decision for the submitter. > > Thanks Rob. I'll ask Qualcomm if there's any problem > with doing that; I presume not. If I re-submit this > with dual copyright, I will include your Reviewed-by > despite the change, OK? FYI I have the go-ahead to use dual GPL-2.0 and BSD-2-Clause bindings on this, and will mark it that way whenever I next post this code for review. I will also be updating other Qualcomm bindings to have a dual copyright (in a separate series). We'll want to get an ack from appropriate Code Aurora developers on those (I'll provide more detail at the time those get posted). -Alex > -Alex > >> >> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >
