On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > After searching for the old property, bail out with -ENODEV > if it was not found. > > It is unnecessary to check if oldprop is NULL before removing > its binary file; the check was already done before. > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied. Thanks. Rob > --- > drivers/of/base.c | 10 +++------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c > index f72d19b..6d4ee22 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/base.c > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c > @@ -1828,17 +1828,13 @@ int of_update_property(struct device_node *np, struct property *newprop) > next = &(*next)->next; > } > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags); > - if (rc) > - return rc; > + if (!found) > + return -ENODEV; > > /* Update the sysfs attribute */ > - if (oldprop) > - sysfs_remove_bin_file(&np->kobj, &oldprop->attr); > + sysfs_remove_bin_file(&np->kobj, &oldprop->attr); > __of_add_property_sysfs(np, newprop); > > - if (!found) > - return -ENODEV; > - > return 0; > } > > -- > 1.7.9.7 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html