Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] cpufreq: qcom: Update the bandwidth levels on frequency change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 6/27/2019 7:04 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
Add support to parse and update optional OPP tables attached to the
cpu nodes when the OPP bandwidth values are populated to enable
scaling of DDR/L3 bandwidth levels with frequency change.

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[]...

@@ -79,13 +108,29 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
  {
  	u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_cc = 0, prev_freq = 0, freq;
  	u32 volt;
+	u64 rate;
  	unsigned int max_cores = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
  	struct cpufreq_frequency_table	*table;
+	struct device_node *opp_table_np, *np;
+	int ret;
table = kcalloc(LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1, sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (!table)
  		return -ENOMEM;
+ ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(cpu_dev);
+	if (!ret) {
+		/* Disable all opps and cross-validate against LUT */
+		opp_table_np = dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(cpu_dev);
+		for_each_available_child_of_node(opp_table_np, np) {
+			ret = of_property_read_u64(np, "opp-hz", &rate);
+			dev_pm_opp_disable(cpu_dev, rate);
+		}
+		of_node_put(opp_table_np);
+	} else {
+		dev_err(cpu_dev, "Couldn't add OPP table from dt\n");

The changelog seems to suggest specifying OPP tables in DT is optional,
but here we seem to error out if the tables are missing.

+	}
+
  	for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
  		data = readl_relaxed(base + REG_FREQ_LUT +
  				      i * LUT_ROW_SIZE);
@@ -104,7 +149,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
if (freq != prev_freq && core_count == max_cores) {
  			table[i].frequency = freq;
-			dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, freq * 1000, volt);
+			qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(cpu_dev, freq, volt);
  			dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "index=%d freq=%d, core_count %d\n", i,
  				freq, core_count);
  		} else {
@@ -125,7 +170,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
  			if (prev_cc != max_cores) {
  				prev->frequency = prev_freq;
  				prev->flags = CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ;
-				dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev,	prev_freq * 1000, volt);
+				qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(cpu_dev, prev_freq,
+							volt);
  			}
break;
@@ -168,6 +214,7 @@ static void qcom_get_related_cpus(int index, struct cpumask *m)
  static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
  {
  	struct device *dev = &global_pdev->dev;
+	struct opp_table *opp_table = NULL;
  	struct of_phandle_args args;
  	struct device_node *cpu_np;
  	struct device *cpu_dev;
@@ -202,6 +249,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
  	if (!base)
  		return -ENOMEM;
+ opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_paths(cpu_dev);
+
  	/* HW should be in enabled state to proceed */
  	if (!(readl_relaxed(base + REG_ENABLE) & 0x1)) {
  		dev_err(dev, "Domain-%d cpufreq hardware not enabled\n", index);
@@ -237,6 +286,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
return 0;
  error:
+	if (opp_table)
+		dev_pm_opp_put_paths(opp_table);
  	devm_iounmap(dev, base);
  	return ret;
  }
@@ -275,6 +326,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cpufreq_qcom_hw_driver = {
static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
+	struct opp_table *opp_table = NULL;
+	struct device *cpu_dev;
  	struct clk *clk;
  	int ret;
@@ -294,6 +347,26 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) global_pdev = pdev; + /* Check for optional interconnect paths on CPU0 */
+	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
+	if (!cpu_dev) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get cpu0 device\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_paths(cpu_dev);
+	if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table);
+		if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "defer icc set paths: %d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "set paths failed ddr/l3 scaling off: %d\n",
+			ret);

Here again, the interconnect paths don't seem to be optional as the comment
above suggests.

+	} else {
+		dev_pm_opp_put_paths(opp_table);
+	}
+
  	ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_qcom_hw_driver);
  	if (ret)
  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "CPUFreq HW driver failed to register\n");


--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux