On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 11:35:52PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Use table based setup to register the DAPM widgets and routes. This on one hand > makes the code a bit cleaner and on the other hand the board level DAPM > elements get registered in the card's DAPM context rather than in the CODEC's > DAPM context. This fixes an issue with double prefixing of routes. Simple patches like this, especially ones that are bug fixes, should come at the start of the series to allow them to be applied first. This cuts down on review if multiple iterations are needed and allows bug fixes to be merged as such.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
