On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:26 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:47 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:59 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Convert the tpo,tpg110 panel binding to DT schema. > > > > > > > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Awesome, fixed up the MAINATINERS entry and applied and > > > pushed for DRM next with my Reviewed-by. > > > > You shouldn't have because this is dependent on patch 2 and > > panel-common.yaml. So now 'make dt_binding_check' is broken. > > Ooops easily happens when I am only adressee on this patch and > there is no mention of any dependencies. It's a series. I would assume the default is 1 person applies a series unless explicitly stated otherwise. > Can I simply just merge the panel-common patch as well and we > are all happy? I have drm-misc commit rights too, so I'll apply the whole lot when it's ready. > I can also pick up more panel binding patches, IMO the yaml > conversions are especially uncontroversial and should have low > threshold for merging. Yes, but the threshold is at least 'make dt_binding_check' should not break. But don't worry, there are 2 other breakages in linux-next currently. Rob
