On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:31:56AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 25/06/2019 09:14:13+0000, Eugen.Hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > Perhaps > > > > > > microchip,digital-filter; > > > microchip,analog-filter; > > > > > > ? > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > Thanks for reviewing. The name of the property does not matter much to > > me, and we have properties prefixed with vendor, and some are not. > > > > @Alexandre Belloni: which name you think it's best ? > > > > I'm not sure, it depends on whether Wolfram thinks it is generic enough > to be used without a vendor prefix. I could imagine that we design a generic property for filters. The ones above make me wonder, though, because they are bool. I'd think you can configure the filters in some way, too? I never used such filtering, so I am unaware of the parameters needed / suitable. Quick grepping through I2C master drivers reveals that i2c-stm32f7.c also handles filters, but only with default values. Maybe DT configuration would be benefitial to that driver, too? Adding some people to CC.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
