On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 04:06:58PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > Hi Russell, > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:59:17AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote: > > > > Currently, ARM32 and ARM64 uses different data structures to represent > > > > their cpu topologies. Since, we are moving the ARM64 topology to common > > > > code to be used by other architectures, we can reuse that for ARM32 as > > > > well. > > > > > > > > Take this opprtunity to remove the redundant functions from ARM32 and > > > > reuse the common code instead. > > > > > > > > To: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx> > > > > Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> (on TC2) > > > > Reviewed-by : Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Hi Russell, > > > > Can we get a ACK for this patch ? We are hoping that the entire > > > > series can be merged at one go. > > > > > > It would be nice to get this in for v5.3 as it's almost there. > > > Are you fine with these changes ? > > > > > > > Do you have any objections with this patch ? We plan to merge through > > RISC-V tree, please let us know. It has been acked-by all the other > > maintainers. > > I have no interest in the CPU topology code; as far as I know I have > no systems that are able to exercise this code in any way. Therefore, > I don't know this code, I have no way to test it, and so it is not > appropriate for me to ack patches for it. > I completely understand that and we can take care of testing. As along as you don't have objections to this, that should be fine I believe. -- Regards, Sudeep
