On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:13:25AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > [Sorry to those receiving this twice... had to dig this out from the > > archives and sent it to the lists from the wrong mailer] > > > > On 27/11/2018 00:44, Brian Dodge wrote: > > >Thank you Pavel, that is a good point. > > > > > >The chip vendor has indicated that there is no reason to maintain the > > >old/improper prefix and wishes to go forward (only) with the "arctic" > > >prefix and any existing dts files are or will be updated. > > > > Looks like this patch series has fallen into the cracks a little. > > > > I think I assumed this info would end in the description of patch v2 1/3 (in > > order to answer Rob's feedback) and I sat and waited for a respin. On the > > other hand... I didn't actually say that explicitly anywhere! So... I'd > > recommend a respin perhaps with a small bit of text explaining how the > > vendor can state that any existing dts files will be updated. This is a > > peripheral device so these strings are probably embedded into OEM > > devicetrees rather than exclusively under the control of the vendor. > > So in next email you give good reason not to apply this :-). Afraid so... it was on page 2 of my google search so I did a quick search, sent the first mail and then went back to my web browser. It was at that moment that I decided a quick search wasn't enough and decided to got a little deeper! Daniel.
