On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 15:52 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 10/06/2019 14:55, Yong Wu wrote:
> > The iommu consumer should use device_link to connect with the
> > smi-larb(supplier). then the smi-larb should run before the iommu
> > consumer. Here we delay the iommu driver until the smi driver is
> > ready, then all the iommu consumer always is after the smi driver.
> >
> > When there is no this patch, if some consumer drivers run before
> > smi-larb, the supplier link_status is DL_DEV_NO_DRIVER(0) in the
> > device_link_add, then device_links_driver_bound will use WARN_ON
> > to complain that the link_status of supplier is not right.
> >
> > This is a preparing patch for adding device_link.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index 6fe3369..f7599d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > id = i;
> >
> > plarbdev = of_find_device_by_node(larbnode);
> > - if (!plarbdev) {
> > + if (!plarbdev || !plarbdev->dev.driver) {
>
> can't we use:
> device_lock()
> device_is_bound(struct device *dev)
> device_unlock()
A new API for me. Thanks the hint. I have tried. it is ok.
>
> > of_node_put(larbnode);
> > return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> > index 0b0908c..c43c4a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c
> > @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > plarbdev = of_platform_device_create(
> > larb_spec.np, NULL,
> > platform_bus_type.dev_root);
> > - if (!plarbdev) {
> > + if (!plarbdev || !plarbdev->dev.driver) {
> > of_node_put(larb_spec.np);
> > return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > }
> >
