On 15 April 2014 07:29, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch fix the offset of CPU boot address and don't operate smc call
> of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command for Exynos3250.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> index aa01c42..6205d4f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> @@ -30,13 +30,16 @@ static int exynos_do_idle(void)
>
> static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu)
> {
> + if (soc_is_exynos3250()) {
> + return 0;
> /*
> * The second parameter of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command means CPU id.
> * But, Exynos4212 has only one secondary CPU so second parameter
> * isn't used for informing secure firmware about CPU id.
> */
> - if (soc_is_exynos4212())
> + } else if (soc_is_exynos4212()) {
> cpu = 0;
> + }
>
As you already return in case of Exynos3250, you need not change this.
First commit hunk without the opening brace should be sufficient.
> exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0);
> return 0;
> @@ -46,7 +49,7 @@ static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr)
> {
> void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c;
>
> - if (!soc_is_exynos4212())
> + if (!soc_is_exynos4212() && !soc_is_exynos3250())
> boot_reg += 4*cpu;
>
> __raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg);
> --
> 1.8.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
