17.06.2019 12:46, Thierry Reding пишет: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 02:35:46AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> There is no problem for drivers to request pll_m and pll_p clocks for >> the device, hence there is no need to use clk_get_sys() and it could be >> replaced with devm_clk_get() for consistency. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c | 12 ++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c >> index 43aef3614b65..527aa4b90e95 100644 >> --- a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c >> +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c >> @@ -527,33 +527,29 @@ static int tegra_emc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> goto unset_cb; >> } >> >> - emc->pll_m = clk_get_sys(NULL, "pll_m"); >> + emc->pll_m = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pll_m"); > > Interesting... I didn't know that clk_get() had a fallback path to > return clk_get_sys() if the named clock wasn't found in DT. That's > nice. > > Looks good to me. Yes, I didn't know either until recently. Thanks!
