On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 04:49:33PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 08:07:16AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Use the SPDX License Identifier for GPL-2.0+ OR X11 > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo-basic.dts | 39 +------------------ > > .../arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo-extended.dts | 39 +------------------ > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo-full.dts | 39 +------------------ > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo.dtsi | 39 +------------------ > > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo-basic.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo-basic.dts > > index db0feb9b9f5d..b6fbceaf6889 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo-basic.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-udoo-neo-basic.dts > > @@ -1,43 +1,6 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR X11) > > This should actually be MIT, not X11. If you look at X11 SPDX > definition, it is for a specifc X Consortium copyright and adds a no > advertising clause on top of MIT. Okay. I just got it fixed on my branch. Shawn