Quoting Sricharan R (2019-06-10 08:45:22)
> On 6/8/2019 9:18 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Wed 05 Jun 10:16 PDT 2019, Sricharan R wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..79cccdd
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
> >> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >> + clock-frequency = <32000>;
> >> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + xo: xo {
> >> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >> + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> >> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + bias_pll_cc_clk {
> >
> > Please give this a label and reference it from the node that uses it
> > (regardless of the implementation matching by clock name).
> >
> ok, in that case, so might have to remove these for now, till we add
> the corresponding users.
Yes, please remove them. They don't look like board clks, instead
they're SoC level details that need to be created by some clk driver
like GCC.
>
> >> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >> + clock-frequency = <300000000>;
> >> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + bias_pll_nss_noc_clk {
> >> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >> + clock-frequency = <416500000>;
> >> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> + };
> >> +
