On Tue, 28 May 2019 18:59:56 +0800 Chun-Hung Wu <chun-hung.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Matthias: > > Thanks for your suggestion, I think device_links is a good way to > make dependency of module's suspend/resume order. > > Hi Jonathan: > > Is it ok to keep using late_suspend and early_resume, or do you think > it's better to use device_links? I think device links would be preferable as the reasoning becomes explicit. As I understand them they are also a less fragile solution. Thanks, Jonathan > > Thanks, > Chun-Hung > On Wed, 2019-05-22 at 18:28 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > On 20/05/2019 08:03, Chun-Hung Wu wrote: > > > Hi Jonathan: > > > > > > Thanks for the prompt reply, > > > > > > On Sat, 2019-05-18 at 11:35 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > >> On Thu, 16 May 2019 16:10:46 +0800 > > >> Chun-Hung Wu <chun-hung.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Move suspend/resume to late_suspend and > > >>> early_resume to gurantee users can use auxadc > > >> guarantee > > >> > > > will fix it in next version. > > >>> driver at suspend/resume stage. > > >> No problem with the patch content, but we need a reason why they may > > >> want to do so? > > > Our thermal drivers uses auxadc at suspend/resume stage. > > > In order to avoid auxadc suspended prior to thermal driver, > > > we move auxadc to late_suspend and early_resume. > > > > > > > That sounds like a user of device_links [1] to me. > > > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/driver-api/device_link.html > > > > > Thanks, > > > Chun-Hung > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Jonathan > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Chun-Hung Wu <chun-hung.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> --- > > >>> drivers/iio/adc/mt6577_auxadc.c | 7 ++++--- > > >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > >>> > > >>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/mt6577_auxadc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/mt6577_auxadc.c > > >>> index e1bdcc0..58d7cb2 100644 > > >>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/mt6577_auxadc.c > > >>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/mt6577_auxadc.c > > >>> @@ -326,9 +326,10 @@ static int mt6577_auxadc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > >>> return 0; > > >>> } > > >>> > > >>> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mt6577_auxadc_pm_ops, > > >>> - mt6577_auxadc_suspend, > > >>> - mt6577_auxadc_resume); > > >>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops mt6577_auxadc_pm_ops = { > > >>> + SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(mt6577_auxadc_suspend, > > >>> + mt6577_auxadc_resume) > > >>> +}; > > >>> > > >>> static const struct of_device_id mt6577_auxadc_of_match[] = { > > >>> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-auxadc", .data = &mt8173_compat}, > > >> > > > > > > > >