On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 18:54, Lukasz Luba <l.luba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This patch provides support for clocks needed for Dynamic Memory Controller > in Exynos5422 SoC. It adds CDREX base register addresses, new DIV, MUX and > GATE entries. > > Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c > index 34cce3c5898f..eecbfcc6b3cf 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c > @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ > #define SRC_CDREX 0x20200 > #define DIV_CDREX0 0x20500 > #define DIV_CDREX1 0x20504 > +#define GATE_BUS_CDREX0 0x20700 > +#define GATE_BUS_CDREX1 0x20704 > #define KPLL_LOCK 0x28000 > #define KPLL_CON0 0x28100 > #define SRC_KFC 0x28200 > @@ -248,6 +250,8 @@ static const unsigned long exynos5x_clk_regs[] __initconst = { > DIV_CDREX1, > SRC_KFC, > DIV_KFC0, > + GATE_BUS_CDREX0, > + GATE_BUS_CDREX1, > }; > > static const unsigned long exynos5800_clk_regs[] __initconst = { > @@ -425,6 +429,9 @@ PNAME(mout_group13_5800_p) = { "dout_osc_div", "mout_sw_aclkfl1_550_cam" }; > PNAME(mout_group14_5800_p) = { "dout_aclk550_cam", "dout_sclk_sw" }; > PNAME(mout_group15_5800_p) = { "dout_osc_div", "mout_sw_aclk550_cam" }; > PNAME(mout_group16_5800_p) = { "dout_osc_div", "mout_mau_epll_clk" }; > +PNAME(mout_mx_mspll_ccore_phy_p) = { "sclk_bpll", "mout_sclk_dpll", > + "mout_sclk_mpll", "ff_dout_spll2", > + "mout_sclk_spll", "mout_sclk_epll"}; > > /* fixed rate clocks generated outside the soc */ > static struct samsung_fixed_rate_clock > @@ -450,7 +457,7 @@ static const struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock > static const struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock > exynos5800_fixed_factor_clks[] __initconst = { > FFACTOR(0, "ff_dout_epll2", "mout_sclk_epll", 1, 2, 0), > - FFACTOR(0, "ff_dout_spll2", "mout_sclk_spll", 1, 2, 0), > + FFACTOR(CLK_FF_DOUT_SPLL2, "ff_dout_spll2", "mout_sclk_spll", 1, 2, 0), > }; > > static const struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5800_mux_clks[] __initconst = { > @@ -472,11 +479,14 @@ static const struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5800_mux_clks[] __initconst = { > MUX(0, "mout_aclk300_disp1", mout_group5_5800_p, SRC_TOP2, 24, 2), > MUX(0, "mout_aclk300_gscl", mout_group5_5800_p, SRC_TOP2, 28, 2), > > + MUX(CLK_MOUT_MX_MSPLL_CCORE_PHY, "mout_mx_mspll_ccore_phy", > + mout_mx_mspll_ccore_phy_p, SRC_TOP7, 0, 3), > + > MUX(CLK_MOUT_MX_MSPLL_CCORE, "mout_mx_mspll_ccore", > - mout_mx_mspll_ccore_p, SRC_TOP7, 16, 2), > + mout_mx_mspll_ccore_p, SRC_TOP7, 16, 3), > MUX_F(CLK_MOUT_MAU_EPLL, "mout_mau_epll_clk", mout_mau_epll_clk_5800_p, > SRC_TOP7, 20, 2, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0), > - MUX(0, "sclk_bpll", mout_bpll_p, SRC_TOP7, 24, 1), > + MUX(CLK_SCLK_BPLL, "sclk_bpll", mout_bpll_p, SRC_TOP7, 24, 1), > MUX(0, "mout_epll2", mout_epll2_5800_p, SRC_TOP7, 28, 1), > > MUX(0, "mout_aclk550_cam", mout_group3_5800_p, SRC_TOP8, 16, 3), > @@ -648,7 +658,7 @@ static const struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5x_mux_clks[] __initconst = { > > MUX(0, "mout_sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_TOP6, 0, 1), > MUX(CLK_MOUT_VPLL, "mout_sclk_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP6, 4, 1), > - MUX(0, "mout_sclk_spll", mout_spll_p, SRC_TOP6, 8, 1), > + MUX(CLK_MOUT_SCLK_SPLL, "mout_sclk_spll", mout_spll_p, SRC_TOP6, 8, 1), > MUX(0, "mout_sclk_ipll", mout_ipll_p, SRC_TOP6, 12, 1), > MUX(0, "mout_sclk_rpll", mout_rpll_p, SRC_TOP6, 16, 1), > MUX_F(CLK_MOUT_EPLL, "mout_sclk_epll", mout_epll_p, SRC_TOP6, 20, 1, > @@ -806,8 +816,21 @@ static const struct samsung_div_clock exynos5x_div_clks[] __initconst = { > "mout_aclk400_disp1", DIV_TOP2, 4, 3), > > /* CDREX Block */ > + /* > + * The three clocks below are controlled using the same register and > + * bits. They are put into one because there is a need of > + * synchronization between the BUS and DREXs (two external memory > + * interfaces). > + * They are put here to show this HW assumption and for clock > + * information summary completeness. > + */ > DIV(CLK_DOUT_PCLK_CDREX, "dout_pclk_cdrex", "dout_aclk_cdrex1", > DIV_CDREX0, 28, 3), > + DIV(CLK_DOUT_PCLK_DREX0, "dout_pclk_drex0", "dout_cclk_drex0", > + DIV_CDREX0, 28, 3), > + DIV(CLK_DOUT_PCLK_DREX1, "dout_pclk_drex1", "dout_cclk_drex0", > + DIV_CDREX0, 28, 3), Offline discussion with Marek and Sylwester suggested to add NOCACHE for the two clocks using the same bits. Otherwise I am fine: Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Krzysztof