On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 08:08:40AM -0700, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:23 AM Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Teres-I has an anx6345 bridge connected to the RGB666 LCD output, and
> > the I2C controlling signals are connected to I2C0 bus. eDP output goes
> > to an Innolux N116BGE panel.
> >
> > Enable it in the device tree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts
> > index 0ec46b969a75..a0ad438b037f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts
> > @@ -65,6 +65,21 @@
> > };
> > };
> >
> > + panel: panel {
> > + compatible ="innolux,n116bge", "simple-panel";
>
> It's still "simple-panel". I believe I already mentioned that Rob
> asked it to be edp-connector.
>
For which there are neither bindings nor drivers.
Is anybody seriously proposing to hold back support for existing
(open source!) hardware in favour of an *imaginable* *possibly* better
solution? Especially when this exact line is already used in some other places?
(there's a space missing btw...)
I'm more than glad to follow any constructive improvements towards better
modularity. However there were none so far, and on top of that, it's a laptop.
I see little advantage in mentioning an internal connector when the panel
connected is always the same.
FWIW, Rob should also have received these patches.
Torsten
