29.05.2019 11:21, Joseph Lo пишет:
> This is the initial patch for Tegra210 EMC clock driver, which doesn't
> include the support code and detail sequence for clock scaling yet.
>
> The driver is designed to support LPDDR4 SDRAM. Because of the LPDDR4
> devices need to do initial time training before it can be used, the
> firmware will help to do that at early boot stage. Then, the trained
> table of the rates we support will pass to the kernel via DT. So the
> driver can get the trained table for clock scaling support.
>
> For the higher rate support (above 800MHz), the periodic training is
> needed for the timing compensation. So basically, two methodologies for
> clock scaling are supported, one is following the clock changing
> sequence to update the EMC table to EMC registers and another is if the
> rate needs periodic training, then we will start a timer to do that
> periodically until it scales to the lower rate.
>
> Based on the work of Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v4:
> - remove the statistic data in debugfs
> - add tegra210_clk_register_emc API to make it compatible with the case
> if the kernel still uses the older DTB which doesn't have EMC node.
> And the MC and EMC clock can still be registered successfully.
> v3:
> - address almost all the comments from the previous version
> - remove the DT parser of EMC table
> - The EMC table is passing as a binary blob now.
> ---
> drivers/memory/tegra/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/memory/tegra/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc.c | 671 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc.h | 156 +++++++
> include/soc/tegra/emc.h | 2 +
> 5 files changed, 840 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/Kconfig b/drivers/memory/tegra/Kconfig
> index 4680124ddcab..9d051bcdbee3 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/tegra/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/Kconfig
> @@ -26,3 +26,13 @@ config TEGRA124_EMC
> Tegra124 chips. The EMC controls the external DRAM on the board.
> This driver is required to change memory timings / clock rate for
> external memory.
> +
> +config TEGRA210_EMC
> + bool "NVIDIA Tegra210 External Memory Controller driver"
> + default y
This is not enough since you're leaving possibility to disable
compilation of the driver, but the compilation will fail because of the
unresolved symbol (tegra210_clk_register_emc).
> + depends on TEGRA_MC && ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC
> + help
> + This driver is for the External Memory Controller (EMC) found on
> + Tegra210 chips. The EMC controls the external DRAM on the board.
> + This driver is required to change memory timings / clock rate for
> + external memory.
Either TEGRA210_EMC Kconfig option shall be always force-selected for
T210 or you should move all the clk-related code into drivers/clk/tegra/.
Could you please give a rationale for having EMC clock code within the
EMC driver?
[snip]
> +static int tegra210_emc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int i;
> + unsigned long table_rate;
> + unsigned long current_rate;
> + struct clk *emc_clk;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct platform_device *mc;
> + struct resource res;
> + struct tegra_emc *emc;
> + void *table_addr;
> +
> + emc_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "emc");
> + if (IS_ERR(emc_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(emc_clk);
Please add newline in a such places in the code to make it more readable.
> + emc = clk_hw_to_emc(__clk_get_hw(emc_clk));
> +
> + np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "nvidia,memory-controller", 0);
> + if (!np) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not get memory controller\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + mc = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> + of_node_put(np);
> + if (!mc)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + emc->mc = platform_get_drvdata(mc);
> + if (!emc->mc)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +
> + emc->emc_base[REG_EMC] = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + emc->emc_base[REG_EMC0] = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1);
> + emc->emc_base[REG_EMC1] = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 2);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < TEGRA_EMC_SRC_COUNT; i++) {
> + if (!IS_ERR(emc_src[i]))
> + clk_put(emc_src[i]);
> +
> + emc_src[i] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, emc_src_names[i]);
> + if (IS_ERR(emc_src[i])) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can not find EMC source clock\n");
> + return -ENODATA;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "memory-region", 0);
> + if (!np) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find EMC table\n");
> + return -ENODATA;
> + }
> +
> + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "nvidia,tegra210-emc-table") ||
> + !of_device_is_available(np)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "EMC table is invalid\n");
> + return -ENODATA;
> + }
> +
> + of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res);
> + table_addr = memremap(res.start, resource_size(&res), MEMREMAP_WB);
> + of_node_put(np);
> + if (!table_addr) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not map EMC table\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + emc->emc_table = (struct emc_table *)table_addr;
There is no need to cast a void. Please make sure that you don't have
any non-upstream patches applied that are changing compiler flags, also
make sure that you're using proper compiler (GCC) if you're getting a
warning here.
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < TEGRA_EMC_MAX_FREQS; i++)
> + if (emc->emc_table[i].rev != 0)
> + emc->emc_table_size++;
> + else
> + break;
> +
> + /* check the supported sequence */
> + while (seq->table_rev) {
> + if (seq->table_rev == emc->emc_table[0].rev)
> + break;
> + seq++;
> + }
> + if (!seq->set_clock) {
> + seq = NULL;
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid EMC sequence for table Rev. %d\n",
> + emc->emc_table[0].rev);
> + return -ENODATA;
> + }
> +
> + emc_clk_sel = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + emc->emc_table_size,
> + sizeof(struct emc_sel),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + /* calculate the rate from source clock */
> + current_rate = emc_get_src_clk_rate() / 1000;
> +
> + /* validate the table */
> + for (i = 0; i < emc->emc_table_size; i++) {
> + table_rate = emc->emc_table[i].rate;
> + if (!table_rate)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (i && ((table_rate <= emc->emc_table[i-1].rate) ||
> + (emc->emc_table[i].min_volt <
> + emc->emc_table[i-1].min_volt)))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (emc->emc_table[i].rev != emc->emc_table[0].rev)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (find_matching_input(&emc->emc_table[i], &emc_clk_sel[i]))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (table_rate == current_rate)
> + emc->current_timing = &emc->emc_table[i];
> + }
I'm suggesting to factor out all the validations into a separate
function for clarity.
--
Dmitry
