On 27-05-19, 11:05, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 04:51:17PM +0800, yibin.gong@xxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@xxxxxxx> > > > > +static const struct of_device_id fsl_edma_dt_ids[] = { > > + { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-edma", .data = (void *)v1 }, > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-edma", .data = (void *)v3 }, > > + { /* sentinel */ } > > Please put a struct type behind the .data pointer so that you can > configure... Yeah that was the idea behind the suggestion in previous version. Something like struct fsl_edma_driver_data { unsigned int channels; ... }; and then you have const struct fsl_edma_driver_data v1_data { .channels = 1; ... }; > > > +}; > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, fsl_edma_dt_ids); > > + > > @@ -218,6 +272,22 @@ static int fsl_edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > fsl_edma_setup_regs(fsl_edma); > > regs = &fsl_edma->regs; > > > > + if (fsl_edma->version == v3) { > > + fsl_edma->dmamux_nr = 1; You can store the struct in driver context or store the values, so here it becomes driver->data->channel; and so on for other data, you can also point function pointers (hint edma/2_irq_init) > > ...things like this... > > > @@ -264,7 +334,11 @@ static int fsl_edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > } > > > > edma_writel(fsl_edma, ~0, regs->intl); > > - ret = fsl_edma_irq_init(pdev, fsl_edma); > > + > > + if (fsl_edma->version == v3) > > + ret = fsl_edma2_irq_init(pdev, fsl_edma); > > + else > > + ret = fsl_edma_irq_init(pdev, fsl_edma); > > ...and this one in that struct rather than littering the code more and > more with such version tests. > > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- ~Vinod