On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:13:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:06:50PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote: > > Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe > > their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to > > a common place instead of duplicate code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 23 --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 303 +----------------------------- > > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/arch_topology.h | 28 +++ > > include/linux/topology.h | 1 + > > 5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-) > > What, now _I_ have to maintain drivers/base/arch_topology.c? That's > nice for everyone else, but not me :( > > Ugh. > > Anyway, what are you wanting to happen to this series? I think we need > some ARM people to sign off on it before I can take the whole thing, > right? > Greg, I am ready to take ownership. Juri the original author of this file agreed and I have been reviewing this file since Juri first wrote it. I am happy to submit a patch assuming maintainership for this file, was just waiting to hear from you when I asked explicitly you and Juri in last version of the patch when Will wanted someone from ARM to be reviewer of this file at-least. I am happy to take over as reviewer or maintainer which ever you prefer. Sorry if I was not so clear in my earlier mail. -- Regards, Sudeep
