Hello Rob,
Thank you for the review.
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:26 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 08:45:06PM +0530, Sagar Shrikant Kadam wrote:
> > Add FU540-C000 specific device tree bindings to already
> > available i2-ocores file. This device is available on
> > HiFive Unleashed Rev A00 board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sagar Shrikant Kadam <sagar.kadam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-ocores.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-ocores.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-ocores.txt
> > index 17bef9a..f6bcf90 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-ocores.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-ocores.txt
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ Device tree configuration for i2c-ocores
> >
> > Required properties:
> > - compatible : "opencores,i2c-ocores" or "aeroflexgaisler,i2cmst"
> > + "sifive,fu540-c000-i2c" or "sifive,i2c0"
>
> If this is Opencores IP, does it really follow the Sifive versioning
> convention? If so, please reference sifive-blocks-ip-versioning.txt
> (which appears to have missed going upstream). Also, referencing the IP
> repository would be good too. If this IP block doesn't follow the same
> convention, then don't try using it for this binding.
>
Yes, the sifive,fu540-c000-i2c is a SoC specific compatibility string,
this way SoC specific
workaround's or bugs, can be handled in the software and the ip-block
specific compatibility
string "sifive,<ip-block-name><integer version number>" i.e.
sifive,i2c0 is IP block specific compatibility
string. Please let me know if I need some correction here?
I will also update reference for sifive-blocks-ip-versioning and the
ip repository into next version of patch.
> > - reg : bus address start and address range size of device
> > - interrupts : interrupt number
> > - clocks : handle to the controller clock; see the note below.
> > @@ -67,3 +68,22 @@ or
> > reg = <0x60>;
> > };
> > };
> > +or
>
> Just a new compatible isn't really a reason to add an example.
>
> > + /*
> > + An Opencore based I2C node in FU540-C000 chip from SiFive
> > + This chip has a hardware erratum for broken IRQ
> > + so it's recommended not to define interrupt in the device node
>
> Then interrupts needs to be optional.
True, I will move interrupts and interrupt parent into optional section
>
> > + */
> > + i2c@10030000 {
> > + compatible = "sifive,i2c0","sifive,fu540-c000-i2c";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x10030000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + reg-names = "i2c-control";
>
> Not doucmented.
In v1, I had added a new binding file as sifive-i2c-ocores.txt for
SiFive i2c core.
After Andrew's suggestion, extending the available i2c-ocores.txt
seemed to be a better idea rather than adding a new file.
so added an example node which is HiFive specific in the existing file.
Please let me know if I need to handle this in a different way.
>
> > + clocks = <&tlclk>;
> > + clock-frequency = <100000>;
> > +
> > + reg-shift = <2>;
> > + reg-io-width = <1>;
> > +
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> >
> > --
> > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> > material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message please do
> > not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender
> > immediately. It should be noted that any review, retransmission,
> > dissemination or other use of, or taking action or reliance upon, this
> > information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> > prohibited
