On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 04:59:40PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote: > The enable-method needs to be psci for the psci_cpuidle_ops to be > correctly registered. > > Add a note to the binding documentation on where to find the declaration > of the enable-method since it is a macro and escapes any attempts to > grep for it. > > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt > index 45730ba60af5..3a42335a6f3d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt > @@ -239,6 +239,10 @@ processor idle states, defined as device tree nodes, are listed. > # On ARM v8 64-bit this property is required and must > be: > - "psci" > + (This assumes that the enable-method is "psci" > + in the cpu node[6] that then uses the > + CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_DECLARE macro to setup the > + psci_cpuidle_ops callbacks) I don't prefer to refer some Linux implementation macros in DT bindings as they may disappear any day. Further, the use of CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_DECLARE is restricted to ARM32 platforms only. So better to move it down without the reference to the above macro or any kernel implementation details if possible. > # On ARM 32-bit systems this property is optional > Something like: "This assumes that the "enable-method" property is set to "psci" in in the cpu node[6] and use this property to set up the CPU idle management in OS PM implementations" With something on these line, you can add: Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx -- Regards, Sudeep
