On 10/05/2019 05:40, Andy Tang wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: 2019年5月10日 11:14 >> To: Andy Tang <andy.tang@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; >> mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >> linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx; rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx; >> edubezval@xxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v6] arm64: dts: ls1088a: add one more thermal >> zone node >> >> Caution: EXT Email >> >> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:25:07AM +0800, Yuantian Tang wrote: >>> Ls1088a has 2 thermal sensors, core cluster and SoC platform. Core >>> cluster sensor is used to monitor the temperature of core and SoC >>> platform is for platform. The current dts only support the first sensor. >>> This patch adds the second sensor node to dts to enable it. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <andy.tang@xxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> v6: >>> - add cooling device map to cpu0-7 in platform node. > I like to explain a little. I think it makes sense that multiple thermal zone map to same cooling device. > In this way, no matter which thermal zone raises a temp alarm, it can call cooling device to chill out. > I also asked cpufreq maintainer about the cooling map issue, he think it would be fine. > I have tested and no issue found. > > Daniel, what's your thought? If there are multiple thermal zones, they will be managed by different instances of a thermal governor. Each instances will act on the shared cooling device and will collide in their decisions: - If the sensors are closed, their behavior will be similar regarding the temperature. The governors may take the same decision for the cooling device. But in such case having just one thermal zone managed is enough. - If the sensors are not closed, their behavior will be different regarding the temperature. The governors will take different decision regarding the cooling device (one will decrease the freq, other will increase the freq). As the thermal governors are not able to manage several thermal zones and there is one cooling device (the cpu cooling device), this setup won't work as expected IMO. The setup making sense is having a thermal zone per 'cluster' and a cooling device per 'cluster'. That means the platform has one clock line per 'cluster'. The thermal management happens in a self-contained thermal zone (one cooling device - one governor - one thermal zone). In the case of HMP, other combinations are possible to be optimal. -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
