Hi, On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 3:17 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 5/7/19 10:59 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:52 AM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 5/6/19 9:48 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote: > >>> We'll add a dummy to just return false. > >> > >> A more complete explanation of why this is needed please. > >> > >> My one guess would be compile testing of arch/sparc/kernel/prom_64.c > >> fails??? > > > > Ah, sorry. Needed for: > > > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAD=FV=Vxp-U7mZUNmAAOja5pt-8rZqPryEvwTg_Dv3ChuH_TrA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Got it. I went and looked at that. I think a better approach would be to > check parent node not "/reserved-memory". I am making this suggestion in > that email thread. OK. Assuming that people are happy with that approach [1], we should consider this patch abandoned. Thanks for your reviews! [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190508154832.241525-1-dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx -Doug
