Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: Add device property firmware-name for QCA6174

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marcel,

On 2019-04-27 13:59, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Rob,

This patch adds an optional device property "firmware-name" to allow
the
driver to load customized nvm firmware file based on this property.

Signed-off-by: Rocky Liao <rjliao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v3:
* added firmware-name instead of nvm-postfix to specify full firmware
name
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt
index 824c0e2..2bcea50 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ Optional properties for compatible string
qcom,qca6174-bt:

- enable-gpios: gpio specifier used to enable chip
- clocks: clock provided to the controller (SUSCLK_32KHZ)
+ - firmware-name: specify the name of nvm firmware to load

Required properties for compatible string qcom,wcn3990-bt:

@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ serial@7570000 {

            enable-gpios = <&pm8994_gpios 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
            clocks = <&divclk4>;
+            firmware-name = "nvm_00440302.bin";
    };

and how is this a firmware-name property. Wouldn’t this be more like
nvm-file or something along these lines. This really needs to be
cleared with Rob to pick the right property name.

Regards

Marcel

Hi Rob,

Are you OK to use a property name "nvm-file" or "firmware-nvm-file"?
Actually we have two firmware files, one is the patch file which is
common to all of the products, the other is the nvm file which is
customized. Using a "nvm-file" or "firmware-nvm-file" property name
would be more clear.

'firmware-name' is the standard name for specifying firmware file names.

but it is not a firmware file, it is a NVM file. What happens if in
the future they need a firmware file and a NVM file?

Regards

Marcel

We won't need to specify a rampatch firmware file in future as it's a same file for all the boards with same chip, only the NVM firmware file may have board differences. NVM file is also one of the firmware files so I think it should be OK to use "firmware-name" property to specify it.

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux