Hi Rob, On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:26 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:34 AM Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 30/04/2019 16:02, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 7:13 AM Geert Uytterhoeven > > > <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> Add DT bindings for the Renesas RZ/A1 Interrupt Controller. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > >> --- > > >> v2: > > >> - Add "renesas,gic-spi-base", > > >> - Document RZ/A2M. > > >> --- > > >> .../renesas,rza1-irqc.txt | 30 +++++++++++++++++++ > > >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) > > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rza1-irqc.txt > > >> > > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rza1-irqc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rza1-irqc.txt > > >> new file mode 100644 > > >> index 0000000000000000..ea8ddb6955338ccd > > >> --- /dev/null > > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rza1-irqc.txt > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > > >> +DT bindings for the Renesas RZ/A1 Interrupt Controller > > >> + > > >> +The RZ/A1 Interrupt Controller is a front-end for the GIC found on Renesas > > >> +RZ/A1 and RZ/A2 SoCs: > > >> + - IRQ sense select for 8 external interrupts, 1:1-mapped to 8 GIC SPI > > >> + interrupts, > > >> + - NMI edge select. > > >> + > > >> +Required properties: > > >> + - compatible: Must be "renesas,<soctype>-irqc", and "renesas,rza1-irqc" as > > >> + fallback. > > >> + Examples with soctypes are: > > >> + - "renesas,r7s72100-irqc" (RZ/A1H) > > >> + - "renesas,r7s9210-irqc" (RZ/A2M) > > >> + - #interrupt-cells: Must be 2 (an interrupt index and flags, as defined > > >> + in interrupts.txt in this directory) > > >> + - interrupt-controller: Marks the device as an interrupt controller > > >> + - reg: Base address and length of the memory resource used by the interrupt > > >> + controller > > >> + - renesas,gic-spi-base: Lowest GIC SPI interrupt number this block maps to. > > > > > > Why isn't this just an 'interrupts' property? > > > > That's likely because of kernel limitations. The DT code does an > > of_populate() on any device that it finds, parse the "interrupts" > > propertiy, resulting in the irq_descs being populated. > > > > That creates havoc, as these interrupts are not for this device, but for > > something that is connected to it. This is merely a bridge of some sort. > > 'interrupt-map' would avoid that problem I think. "interrupt-map" seems to be meant for translation on a bus? What to do with the child and parent unit addresses fields? The parent unit address size depends on the #address-cells of the parent interrupt-controller (i.e. GIC, so it's zero). But the child unit address size depends on the #address-cells of the bus node on which the child is located, so that's a (non-zero) bus #address-cells (from the root node), not an interrupt-controller #address-cells. Each line in an interrupt-map also contains a child interrupt specifier. As the RZ/A1 IRQC supports 8 interrupt inputs with 4 sense types, that would mean 32 lines? Or should I just ignore the senses here, and specify 0? i.e. interrupt-map = <0 0 0 &gic GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, 0 1 0 &gic GIC_SPI 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, 0 2 0 &gic GIC_SPI 2 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, 0 3 0 &gic GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, 0 4 0 &gic GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, 0 5 0 &gic GIC_SPI 5 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, 0 6 0 &gic GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, 0 7 0 &gic GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; (using zero for the child unit addresses, too)? > > Furthermore, this is a rather long established practice: gic-v2m, > > gic-v3-mbi, mediatek,sysirq, mediatek,cirq... All the bits of glue that > > for one reason or another plug onto the GIC use the same method. > > All handling the mapping to the parent in their own way... > > > > Plus, without 'interrupts' walking the hierarchy is broken. > > > > Erm... Which hierarchy? > > of_irq_init() expects that an interrupt-controller without an > interrupt-parent is the root controller. So you're right. We only need That applies to IRQCHIP_DECLARE() drivers only, not platform device drivers, right? > to have an 'interrupt-parent', but not 'interrupts'. This is implied by "interrupt-parent = <&gic>;" on the soc node. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds