On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 18:05, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 17:34, Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Allwinner H6 has a r_watchdog similar to A64.
> > >
> > > Declare it in the device-tree.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi
> > > index 5c2f5451227b..66dc684a378e 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi
> > > @@ -622,6 +622,13 @@
> > > #reset-cells = <1>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + r_watchdog: watchdog@7020400 {
> > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt",
> > > + "allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt";
> > > + reg = <0x07020400 0x20>;
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 103 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > + };
> >
> > I have set the same compatible as A64 because regarding the User
> > Manual they have exactly the same memory mapping.
> > However we don't know really if it's the same IP version, maybe there
> > will be an errata one day.
> > So I would like to know if it's better to define the h6-wdt also
> > compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-wdt", "allwinner,sun50i-a64-wdt",
> > "allwinner,sun6i-a31-wdt";
> >
> > I would say Yes, but with this logic we would have to had a new
> > compatible each time there is a new SoC.
>
Hi,
> Why not just having the A31 compatible?
H6 has a lightly differences in registers with A31 but it's the same
as 64 (WDOG_KEY_FIELD)
As the A64 is already introduced if think it's a good solution to reuse it.
Clément
>
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
