Hi, Yongqiang:
On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 14:19 +0800, yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch add background color input select function for ovl/ovl_2l
>
> ovl include 4 DRAM layer and 1 background color layer
> ovl_2l include 4 DRAM layer and 1 background color layer
> DRAM layer frame buffer data from render hardware, GPU for example.
> backgournd color layer is embed in ovl/ovl_2l, we can only set
> it color, but not support DRAM frame buffer.
>
> for ovl0->ovl0_2l direct link usecase,
> we need set ovl0_2l background color intput select from ovl0
> if render send DRAM buffer layer number <=4, all these layer read
> by ovl.
> layer0 is at the bottom of all layers.
> layer3 is at the top of all layers.
> if render send DRAM buffer layer numbfer >=4 && <=6
> ovl0 read layer0~3
> ovl0_2l read layer4~5
> layer5 is at the top ot all these layers.
>
> the decision of how to setting ovl0/ovl0_2l read these layer data
> is controlled in mtk crtc, which will be another patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> index a0ab760..c226284 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
> #define DISP_REG_OVL_EN 0x000c
> #define DISP_REG_OVL_RST 0x0014
> #define DISP_REG_OVL_ROI_SIZE 0x0020
> +#define DISP_REG_OVL_DATAPATH_CON 0x0024
> +#define OVL_BGCLR_SEL_IN BIT(2)
> #define DISP_REG_OVL_ROI_BGCLR 0x0028
> #define DISP_REG_OVL_SRC_CON 0x002c
> #define DISP_REG_OVL_CON(n) (0x0030 + 0x20 * (n))
> @@ -245,6 +247,26 @@ static void mtk_ovl_layer_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int idx,
> mtk_ovl_layer_on(comp, idx);
> }
>
> +static void mtk_ovl_bgclr_in_on(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp,
> + enum mtk_ddp_comp_id prev)
> +{
> + int is_ovl = 0;
> +
> + if (prev == DDP_COMPONENT_OVL0 ||
> + prev == DDP_COMPONENT_OVL0_2L ||
> + prev == DDP_COMPONENT_OVL1_2L)
> + is_ovl = 1;
I think this logic should be moved to mtk crtc and OVL need not to care
about which component is in front of it.
Regards,
CK
> +
> + mtk_ddp_write_mask((is_ovl << 2), comp,
> + DISP_REG_OVL_DATAPATH_CON, OVL_BGCLR_SEL_IN);
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_ovl_bgclr_in_off(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp)
> +{
> + mtk_ddp_write_mask(0, comp,
> + DISP_REG_OVL_DATAPATH_CON, OVL_BGCLR_SEL_IN);
> +}
> +
> static const struct mtk_ddp_comp_funcs mtk_disp_ovl_funcs = {
> .config = mtk_ovl_config,
> .start = mtk_ovl_start,
> @@ -255,6 +277,8 @@ static void mtk_ovl_layer_config(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int idx,
> .layer_on = mtk_ovl_layer_on,
> .layer_off = mtk_ovl_layer_off,
> .layer_config = mtk_ovl_layer_config,
> + .bgclr_in_on = mtk_ovl_bgclr_in_on,
> + .bgclr_in_off = mtk_ovl_bgclr_in_off,
> };
>
> static int mtk_disp_ovl_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
