Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] v4l: vsp1: Add DT support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Laurent,

On 03/04/14 01:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> @@ -534,6 +569,7 @@ static struct platform_driver vsp1_platform_driver = {
>>> > >   		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
>>> > >   		.name	= "vsp1",
>>> > >   		.pm	= &vsp1_pm_ops,
>>> > > +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(vsp1_of_match),
>> > 
>> > Is of_match_ptr() really useful here, when vsp1_of_match[] array is always
>> > compiled in ?
>
> Would it be better to compile the vsp1_of_match[] array conditionally ? On the 
> other hand the driver is only useful (at least at the moment) on ARM Renesas 
> SoCs, which are transitioning to DT anyway.

Given that #ifdefs could be soon removed anyway (when the platform becomes
dt-only) I guess it's better not to introduce it now.

-- 
Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux