Re: [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/15/19 8:27 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Hi Atish,

Thanks again for doing this. Overall changes look good except a couple
of minor nit, see below.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 04:48:04PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
a common place instead of duplicate code.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h |  23 ---
  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c      | 303 +-----------------------------
  drivers/base/arch_topology.c      | 298 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  drivers/base/topology.c           |   1 +
  include/linux/arch_topology.h     |  28 +++
  5 files changed, 330 insertions(+), 323 deletions(-)


[...]

diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
index edfcf8d9..6cc6a860 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
   * Written by: Juri Lelli, ARM Ltd.
   */
-#include <linux/acpi.h>
  #include <linux/arch_topology.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
  #include <linux/cpu.h>
  #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
  #include <linux/device.h>
@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
  #include <linux/string.h>
  #include <linux/sched/topology.h>
  #include <linux/cpuset.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, freq_scale) = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE; @@ -278,3 +283,294 @@ static void parsing_done_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
  #else
  core_initcall(free_raw_capacity);
  #endif
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_RISCV)

Why can't the above one be just GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY ?
I may be missing to find it myself, but would like to know.

GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY is now used for both RISCV, ARM & ARM64.
The below functions under this #ifdef have different implementation for ARM and ARM64.

parse_dt_topology
cpu_coregroup_mask
update_siblings_masks

While we can combine the later two functions and move them to common code as well, parse_dt_topology is significantly different.

That's why we need some kind of #ifdef or renaming of parse_dt_topology for ARM32 code.

Thanks for the review!!

Regards,
Atish
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_RISCV)

Ditto.

--
Regards,
Sudeep





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux