On 4/15/19 2:29 AM, Brian Masney wrote:
> Add fwnode support to the lm3630a driver and allow configuring
> the initial and maximum LED brightness on both LED banks independently.
> The two outputs can be controlled by bank A and B independently or
> bank A can control both outputs.
>
> If the platform data was not configured, then the driver defaults to
> enabling both banks. This patch changes the default value to disable
> both banks before parsing the firmware node so that just a single bank
> can be enabled if desired. There are no in-tree users of this driver.
>
> Driver was tested on a LG Nexus 5 (hammerhead) phone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v2
> - Separated out control banks and outputs via the reg and led-sources
> properties.
> - Use fwnode instead of of API
> - Disable both banks by default before calling lm3630a_parse_node()
> - Add lots of error handling
> - Check for duplicate source / bank definitions
> - Remove extra ;
> - Make probe() method fail if fwnode parsing fails.
>
> drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c
> index ef2553f452ca..15922da9c05a 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lm3630a_bl.c
> @@ -364,6 +364,116 @@ static const struct regmap_config lm3630a_regmap = {
> .max_register = REG_MAX,
> };
>
> +/**
> + * lm3630a_parse_led_sources - Parse the optional led-sources fwnode property.
> + * @node: firmware node
> + * @default_bitmask: bitmask to return if the led-sources property was not
> + * specified
> + *
> + * Parses the optional led-sources firmware node and returns a bitmask that
> + * contains the outputs that are associated with the control bank. If the
> + * property is missing, then the value of of @default_bitmask will be returned.
> + */
> +static int lm3630a_parse_led_sources(struct fwnode_handle *node,
> + int default_bitmask)
> +{
> + int ret, num_sources, i;
> + u32 sources[2];
> +
> + num_sources = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "led-sources", NULL,
> + 0);
> + if (num_sources < 0)
> + return default_bitmask;
> + else if (num_sources > ARRAY_SIZE(sources))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "led-sources", sources,
> + num_sources);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < num_sources; i++) {
> + if (sources[i] < 0 || sources[i] > 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret |= BIT(sources[i]);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int lm3630a_parse_node(struct lm3630a_chip *pchip,
> + struct lm3630a_platform_data *pdata)
> +{
> + int seen = 0, led_sources, ret;
> + struct fwnode_handle *node;
> + u32 bank, val;
> + bool linear;
> +
> + device_for_each_child_node(pchip->dev, node) {
> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &bank);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (bank < 0 || bank > 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (seen & BIT(bank))
> + return -EINVAL;
Need line break for clarity.
> + seen |= BIT(bank);
> +
> + led_sources = lm3630a_parse_led_sources(node, BIT(bank));
> + if (led_sources < 0)
> + return led_sources;
> +
> + linear = fwnode_property_read_bool(node,
> + "ti,linear-mapping-mode");
> + if (bank == 0) {
> + if (!(led_sources & BIT(0)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + pdata->leda_ctrl = linear ?
> + LM3630A_LEDA_ENABLE_LINEAR :
> + LM3630A_LEDA_ENABLE;
> +
> + if (led_sources & BIT(1)) {
> + if (seen & BIT(1))
> + return -EINVAL;
Need line break for clarity.
> + seen |= BIT(1);
> +
> + pdata->ledb_ctrl = LM3630A_LEDB_ON_A;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (led_sources & BIT(0) || !(led_sources & BIT(1)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + pdata->ledb_ctrl = linear ?
> + LM3630A_LEDB_ENABLE_LINEAR :
> + LM3630A_LEDB_ENABLE;
> + }
> +
> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(node, "default-brightness",
> + &val);
> + if (!ret) {
> + if (bank == 0)
> + pdata->leda_init_brt = val;
> + else
> + pdata->ledb_init_brt = val;
> + }
> +
> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(node, "max-brightness", &val);
> + if (!ret) {
> + if (bank == 0)
> + pdata->leda_max_brt = val;
> + else
> + pdata->ledb_max_brt = val;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
Shouldn't we return ret here and set ret to -ENODEV?
If device_for_each does not find a node if falls through and returns a success but really is should fail.
> +}
> +
> static int lm3630a_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> @@ -396,13 +506,20 @@ static int lm3630a_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (pdata == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> +
> /* default values */
> - pdata->leda_ctrl = LM3630A_LEDA_ENABLE;
> - pdata->ledb_ctrl = LM3630A_LEDB_ENABLE;
> + pdata->leda_ctrl = LM3630A_LEDA_DISABLE;
> + pdata->ledb_ctrl = LM3630A_LEDB_DISABLE;
This is not needed since default is disabled and kzalloc will set these to 0
> pdata->leda_max_brt = LM3630A_MAX_BRIGHTNESS;
> pdata->ledb_max_brt = LM3630A_MAX_BRIGHTNESS;
> pdata->leda_init_brt = LM3630A_MAX_BRIGHTNESS;
> pdata->ledb_init_brt = LM3630A_MAX_BRIGHTNESS;
> +
> + rval = lm3630a_parse_node(pchip, pdata);
> + if (rval) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "fail : parse node\n");
> + return rval;
> + }
> }
> pchip->pdata = pdata;
>
> @@ -470,11 +587,18 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id lm3630a_id[] = {
> {}
> };
>
> +static const struct of_device_id lm3630a_match_table[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ti,lm3630a", },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +
Extra new line here.
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, lm3630a_id);
>
> static struct i2c_driver lm3630a_i2c_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = LM3630A_NAME,
> + .of_match_table = lm3630a_match_table,
> },
> .probe = lm3630a_probe,
> .remove = lm3630a_remove,
>
