On 11/04/19 8:30 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@xxxxxx> [190410 04:15]:
>> +Example:
>> +--------
>> +The following example demonstrates both interrupt router node and the consumer
>> +node(main gpio) on the AM654 SoC:
>> +
>> +main_intr: interrupt-controller0 {
>> + compatible = "ti,sci-intr";
>> + ti,intr-trigger-type = <1>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&gic500>;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> + ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
>> + ti,sci-dst-id = <56>;
>> + ti,sci-rm-range-girq = <0x1>;
>> +};
>
> To me it seems there should not be too many of these interrupt
> controller nodes for each SoC. Maybe you're already planning on
> doing it, but I suggest that you just add more specific compatibles
> and then look up the dst-id from a mapping table in the driver
> similar to what patch 04/12 in this series is already doing.
>
> That way you don't need to add custom TI specific (firmware
> defined) device tree properties listed above ;)
I am tired of arguing on this. We did close this topic in the previous version
of this series. Why do you want to keep re visiting the same. Sorry, I am not
going change unless I receive a Nack from Marc or Rob.
Thanks and regards,
Lokesh
