On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:34:57AM +0000, Viorel Suman wrote: > Hi Nicolin, > > On Ma, 2019-04-09 at 21:29 -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > WARNING: This email was created outside of NXP. DO NOT CLICK links or > > attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > > safe. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:27:39AM +0000, Viorel Suman wrote: > > > > > > Use "of_device_id.data" to specify the machine driver > > > instead of "model" DTS attribute. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@xxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > --- > > > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_audmix.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > > --------- > > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > > > > > + priv->pdev = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev, mdrv, > > > 0, NULL, > > > + 0); > > Would you please send a separate patch to replace "pdev->dev"? > > Thank you for review. Yes, will send V3. Ah...when I said that, I was literally saying that you should send a separate patch individually, not resend the series. Now I see you sent v3/v4 almost at the same time as "Applied" mails from Mark. And I am totally confused which version got applied.... Please rebase your local tree and find out which version got applied and then send the diff with a separate patch. Thanks Nicolin
