Hi!
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 03:11:41PM -0500, Thor Thayer - Sendmail wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 07:28 +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 05:07:06PM -0500, tthayer@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Addition of the Altera SDRAM controller bindings and device
> > > tree changes to the Altera SoC project.
> > >
>
> <snip>
>
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..351ab7b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram.txt
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > +Altera SOCFPGA SDRAM Controller
> > > +
> > > +Required properties:
> > > +- compatible : "altr,sdr-ctl", "syscon";
> > > + Note that syscon is invoked for this device to support the FPGA
> > > + bridge driver and possibly other devices in the future. See
> > > + also Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.txt
> >
> > This note is really linux specific (and specific to some vendor kernel driver
> > for that matter). I think you should remove that.
>
> Hi Steffen. Are you asking for the path to syscon.txt to be removed or
> the entire note?
> The note is explaining why the "syscon" tag is used for this Altera IP
> block (registers shared between multiple drivers).
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
I was referring to the note. I don't know what the current guideline is for
this type of "devices", but I think referring to the syscon documentation
is okay.
The first part however describes a DT binding with things that might or might
not happen in the future. What I want to say is, I would rather have this
reworded, to have it just describe the SDRAM controller node as simple as it may
be.
> >
> > > +- reg : Should contain 1 register ranges(address and length)
> > > +
> > > +Example:
> > > + sdrctl@0xffc25000 {
> > > + compatible = "altr,sdr-ctl", "syscon";
> > > + reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>;
> > > + };
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > > index 9e78c1d..3634de7 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > > @@ -528,6 +528,11 @@
> > > reg-io-width = <4>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + sdrctl@0xffc25000 {
^^
Oh, and Dinh just mentioned in my patch, that the 0x shall be removed here.
But I'm not so sure about that. Just FYI.
> > > + compatible = "altr,sdr-ctl", "syscon";
> > > + reg = <0xffc25000 0x1000>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > rstmgr@ffd05000 {
> > > compatible = "altr,rst-mgr";
> > > reg = <0xffd05000 0x1000>;
Regards,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
