> > > "Patches floating around" is not a very convincing argument why > > > "silabs" should not just be used instead. I have no problem taking > > > this, but if changing to silabs is possible, we may want to do that. > > I think energymicro is still the right prefix, because back when efm32 > > was created it was still Energy Micro. Or am I wrong here? I agree with the "EnergyMicro" reasoning. > (Wolfram, I just noticed that I failed to fix the binding docs for the > changed compatible string. Should I send a fixup or a v5?) Fixup, please.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
