On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:24 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 02:41:05PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > DT dictates aligning with what the h/w looks like which has little to > > do with OS driver design. > > Ok, then, where does this goal for doing a driver or compilation unit > per IP block come from? > > Because everytime an ARM EDAC driver pops up, we are having the same > discussion. > > > I never said you should change EDAC and I outlined how things should > > be handled if it is one driver. > > Ok, we will add that to the EDAC driver design document we're currently > working on. > > > DT and OS subsystems are independent things. I can't tell you how to > > design the subsystem and you can't dictate DT design (based on EDAC > > design). > > I don't think I've ever intentionally or unintentionally dictated DT > design - all I've opposed to is having multiple EDAC drivers on ARM. No, but folks just extend 1 driver to mean 1 DT node because that's easy and certainly the more common case. Rob
