On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 01:44:26PM +0100, Michal Vokáč wrote: > Hi Christian, > > I added all the original recipients back to your PM as we may get some > useful feedback from someone. > > On 21. 03. 19 0:17, Christian Lamparter wrote: > >On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 12:09:05 PM CET you wrote: > >>The switch is accessible through pseudo PHY which is located at 0x10. > > > >It doesn't look like your patch made it to the device-tree patchwork?! > >(Maybe your @ysoft.com is blacklisted or something else is broken?) > > I am aware of that and I am quite sure my mail is not blacklisted. > I submitted quite some patches recently and some of those made it to > the device-tree patchwork with no problem. I've got the impression that > only patches that modify something inside Documentation/devicetree/ are > visible there (but I do not really know how the system works). > > @Rob, would you mind to shortly clarify how this works? > > >Also I don't think devicetree-tree would merge it. I think the best bet > >would be to resent the mail and include netdev mailing list and everyone > >from the get_maintainer.pl output: > > I always use the get_maintainter.pl script to get some initial list and > then I apply common sense to shrink/broaden the list to which people and > lists send the patches. > > >Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE) > >Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE) > >Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (reviewer:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE) > >Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> (reviewer:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE) > >NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@xxxxxxx> (reviewer:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE) > >devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS) > >linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE) > > In this case this is really trivial patch so I think bothering all those > people is not necessary. In my case the script actually reports more > items then what you posted. For future patches, please do copy folks above. We need more eyes. Shawn
