Hi Angus, On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:21:58 -0700 Angus Ainslie <angus@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > On 2019-03-20 07:53, Tomas Novotny wrote: > > Hi Angus, > > > > On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 08:47:58 -0700 > > "Angus Ainslie (Purism)" <angus@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> The VCNL4200 datasheet says that word read and writes should be used > >> to access the registers. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Angus Ainslie (Purism) <angus@xxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c > >> b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c > >> index 04fd0d4b6f19..5295330b65e2 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c > >> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c > >> @@ -140,10 +140,10 @@ static int vcnl4200_init(struct vcnl4000_data > >> *data) > >> data->rev = (ret >> 8) & 0xf; > >> > >> /* Set defaults and enable both channels */ > >> - ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, VCNL4200_AL_CONF, > >> 0x00); > >> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_word_data(data->client, VCNL4200_AL_CONF, > >> 0x00); > > > > minor note: the 0x00 looks like a byte. 0 or 0x0000 would be slightly > > better? > > The same below. > > > >> if (ret < 0) > >> return ret; > >> - ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, VCNL4200_PS_CONF1, > >> 0x00); > >> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_word_data(data->client, VCNL4200_PS_CONF1, > >> 0x00); > > > > The VCNL4200_PS_CONF1 definition is a bit misleading with word write. > > Because > > PS_CONF1 is only a low byte of command code 0x03. The high byte of 0x03 > > is > > PS_CONF2. I would rename it. > > > > As far as a base address for the register that is correct based on the > names in the datasheet. I suppose I could add something like: > > #define VCNL4200_PS_CONF VCNL4200_PS_CONF1 > > and change the reference here if you think that would be more clear. to be honest, I don't know the best practice. As there is also PS_CONF3, I was thinking about PS_CONF1_2, but thinking again, your current name is good enough maybe. Tomas > >> if (ret < 0) > >> return ret; > > > > Anyway, the main point is that I've tested this patch on VCNL4200 and > > it > > works, so: > > Tested-by: Tomas Novotny <tomas@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > T. > > Thanks for testing it > Angus >
