Hi Martin,
On 2019/3/21 4:48, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
Hi Liang,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 4:32 AM Liang Yang <liang.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your time.
On 2019/3/20 4:27, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
Hello Liang,
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 11:55 AM Martin Blumenstingl
<martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
Allocating a fixed size info buffer before nand_scan_ident and attach it
on the struct meson_nfc; Or considering not use dma for reading data
less than 8 bytes. Both can reduce kmalloc and kfree calling. Thanks.
both suggestions sound reasonable.
however, I will search for the root cause of the unaligned address
first before changing the Meson NFC driver.
That is good. And i will implement one of both mentioned above soon.
[...]
[ 2.227374] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 2.231968] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c:5503 nand_scan_with_ids+0x1718/0x171c
[ 2.241760] No oob scheme defined for oobsize 1280
...
(the "No oob scheme defined for oobsize 1280" message is expected)
miss mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &meson_ooblayout_ops) on function
meson_nand_attach_chip.
thank you for the suggestion. I didn't have time to test this on my
board yet but I'll let you know about my results during the weekend.
Does the missing mtd_set_ooblayout() call also affect GXL or AXG boards?
Yes. I deleted it unintentionally.
Regards
Martin
.
