On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:54:09AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> > >> > This however comes back to the more general issue of serial port device > >> > naming: Linux traditionally uses separate names per driver (e.g. ttySC0 > >> > instead of ttyS0). > >> > > >> > There has been discussion in the past about changing this to let all > >> > drivers use the same namespace, but it's not yet clear to me how we'd do > >> > this in a 100% backwards compatible way. Maybe it's best left to udev to > >> > figure out the driver independent name, but then we definitely should use > >> > the alias for that name. > > This discussion has come up in just the last month or so. > > My opinion is device name numbering should start at 0 with 0 being the > preferred console device. That's completely different to everything I've heard and seen so far ;) For specifying the console we have the linux,stdout-path property in the chosen node. My preferred console may not be a serial port at all in which case I would end up with a serial0 = &lcd0 alias. Many devicetrees specify aliases for i2c/spi/mmc controllers aswell. Should they order their i2c controllers in the order of preference now? Most dtsi files in the kernel specify a SoC specific order of aliases and I think this makes the most sense. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
