Re: [PATCH] regulator: Use of_node_name_eq for node name comparisons

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Fabio,

Am Mittwoch, den 13.03.2019, 14:36 -0300 schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:22 PM Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Unfortunately this change causes a regression on systems with MC13xxx
> > regulators. The desc.name field is filled with an uppercase name of the
> > regulator, while the existing DTs (as far as I know) all use lowercase
> > node names, so the matching in the function above doesn't work anymore.
> > 
> > Any opinions about how to proceed here?
> 
> Does this patch fix the problem?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20190306&id=ec520911ecc7eaf01a

I wasn't aware of this patch. I haven't tested it yet, but this looks
like it should fix the problem. I just wasn't sure if that's the route
we want to go, as I don't know if there are any out of tree DTs that
use uppercase node names.

But as there seems to be agreement to just change the regulator names
to lowercase, I consider this issue fixed.

Regards,
Lucas



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux