On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 06:26:39PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 14:42:27 +0100 > Andreas Klinger <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Add doc for dt binding maxbotix,i2cxl. This binding is for MaxBotix > > I2CXL-MaxSonar ultrasonic rangers which share a common i2c interface. > > I'm a bit confused on the naming. Certainly the binding should have > separate entries for each supported part, rather than a group one > for their i2cxl naming. Having said that they do have a wide > range of parts with only the one datasheet. > > Rob, what do you think? Go with this i2cxl naming > or list the individual supported parts? Looks like the difference is mainly just the range. Is that something s/w needs to know about? > > mb1202, mb1212, mb1222, mb1232, mb1242, mb7040, > mb7137? OTOH, that's not really too many. Rob