Hi,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 8:49 PM Hsin-Hsiung Wang
<hsin-hsiung.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Ran Bi <ran.bi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Alarm registers high byte was reserved for other functions.
> This add mask in alarm registers operation functions.
> This also fix error condition in interrupt handler.
>
> Fixes: fc2979118f3f ("rtc: mediatek: Add MT6397 RTC driver")
>
add a Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx here to apply to all stable kernels
for the critical fixup patch.
> Signed-off-by: Ran Bi <ran.bi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> index e9a25ec..f85f1fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,14 @@
>
> #define RTC_AL_SEC 0x0018
>
> +#define RTC_AL_SEC_MASK 0x003f
> +#define RTC_AL_MIN_MASK 0x003f
> +#define RTC_AL_HOU_MASK 0x001f
> +#define RTC_AL_DOM_MASK 0x001f
> +#define RTC_AL_DOW_MASK 0x0007
> +#define RTC_AL_MTH_MASK 0x000f
> +#define RTC_AL_YEA_MASK 0x007f
> +
> #define RTC_PDN2 0x002e
> #define RTC_PDN2_PWRON_ALARM BIT(4)
>
> @@ -111,7 +119,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread(int irq, void *data)
> irqen = irqsta & ~RTC_IRQ_EN_AL;
> mutex_lock(&rtc->lock);
> if (regmap_write(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_IRQ_EN,
> - irqen) < 0)
> + irqen) == 0)
> mtk_rtc_write_trigger(rtc);
> mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);
>
> @@ -233,12 +241,12 @@ static int mtk_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm)
> alm->pending = !!(pdn2 & RTC_PDN2_PWRON_ALARM);
> mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);
>
> - tm->tm_sec = data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC];
> - tm->tm_min = data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN];
> - tm->tm_hour = data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR];
> - tm->tm_mday = data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM];
> - tm->tm_mon = data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH];
> - tm->tm_year = data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR];
> + tm->tm_sec = data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] & RTC_AL_SEC_MASK;
> + tm->tm_min = data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] & RTC_AL_MIN_MASK;
> + tm->tm_hour = data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] & RTC_AL_HOU_MASK;
> + tm->tm_mday = data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] & RTC_AL_DOM_MASK;
> + tm->tm_mon = data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] & RTC_AL_MTH_MASK;
> + tm->tm_year = data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] & RTC_AL_YEA_MASK;
>
> tm->tm_year += RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET;
> tm->tm_mon--;
> @@ -259,14 +267,25 @@ static int mtk_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm)
> tm->tm_year -= RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET;
> tm->tm_mon++;
>
> - data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] = tm->tm_sec;
> - data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] = tm->tm_min;
> - data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] = tm->tm_hour;
> - data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] = tm->tm_mday;
> - data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] = tm->tm_mon;
> - data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] = tm->tm_year;
> -
> mutex_lock(&rtc->lock);
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_AL_SEC,
> + data, RTC_OFFSET_COUNT);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto exit;
> +
Why did we need an additional regmap_bulk_read here? I would suppose
data[RTC_OFFSET_*] & ~(RTC_AL_*_MASK) is always equal to 0.
It might be another fixup since change is not being mentioned in the
git message.
> + data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] & ~(RTC_AL_SEC_MASK)) |
> + (tm->tm_sec & RTC_AL_SEC_MASK));
> + data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] & ~(RTC_AL_MIN_MASK)) |
> + (tm->tm_min & RTC_AL_MIN_MASK));
> + data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] & ~(RTC_AL_HOU_MASK)) |
> + (tm->tm_hour & RTC_AL_HOU_MASK));
> + data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] & ~(RTC_AL_DOM_MASK)) |
> + (tm->tm_mday & RTC_AL_DOM_MASK));
> + data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] & ~(RTC_AL_MTH_MASK)) |
> + (tm->tm_mon & RTC_AL_MTH_MASK));
> + data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] & ~(RTC_AL_YEA_MASK)) |
> + (tm->tm_year & RTC_AL_YEA_MASK));
> +
> if (alm->enabled) {
> ret = regmap_bulk_write(rtc->regmap,
> rtc->addr_base + RTC_AL_SEC,
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
