On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 24 March 2014 14:39:39 mohun106@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cavium-thunder.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cavium-thunder.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..6ea0a34 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cavium-thunder.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ >> +Cavium Thunder platform device tree bindings >> +--------------------------------------------- >> + >> +Boards with Cavium's Thunder SoC shall have following properties. >> + >> +Root Node >> +--------- >> +Required root node properties: >> + - compatible = "cavium,thunder"; >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt >> index 333f4ae..f6cadf1 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt >> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ nodes to be present and contain the properties described below. >> "arm,cortex-r4" >> "arm,cortex-r5" >> "arm,cortex-r7" >> + "cavium,thunder" >> "faraday,fa526" >> "intel,sa110" >> "intel,sa1100" > > > It seems very confusing to use the same name for both the SoC and the > CPU core. Can you guarantee that there will never be another SoC with > the same core, or a different CPU core in a SoC with the same name? > > If not, please be more specific here and use the exact model names > rather than the product names. OK, will fix this once I discuss this internally. > > Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
