On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 03:11:57PM +0100, Carlo Caione wrote:
> > > +
> > > +Example:
> > > +
> > > +axp: axp20x@34 {
> > > + reg = <0x34>;
> > > + interrupt-parent = <&nmi_intc>;
> > > + interrupts = <0 8>;
> > > +
> > > + compatible = "x-powers,axp209";
> > > + interrupt-controller;
> > > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > > +
> > > + regulators {
> >
> > Do we really need that subnode ? it looks useless, and we already know
> > that we are defining regulators here.
>
> What do you mean? We are defining the MFD and regulators are just one of
> the subsystem here.
I mean that it's useless.
> Moveover I'm using the "regulators" node in the
> regulators driver (using of_find_node_by_name()) to get the regulators
> configuration.
Can't you just use the of_node field of whatever struct device you
get?
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
