* David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [190220 20:42]: > From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:33:26 -0800 > > > * David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [190220 19:23]: > >> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> > >> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:25:19 +0200 > >> > >> > Deprecate cpsw-phy-sel driver as it's been replaced with new > >> > TI phy-gmii-sel PHY driver. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> > >> > >> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks for the ack, but actually I'd prefer you to pick > > this patch at some future date. I suggest Grygorii just > > repost this one after v5.1-rc1. > > It's so much easier if you group this with those DT changes, they > logically belong together as well and it helps someone reading > the changes in the tree also if they are side by side. I agree that a group of patches should go together in most cases. > Why don't you want to integrate this with them? Because the arm-soc tree wants dts changes separately in general. The dts changes are considered firmware describing hardware. And it makes it possible to split the arm-soc pile of patches into multiple pull requests. In theory there should be no dependency between dts changes and driver changes, but in reality that's not always the case :) What I can do is set up a separate branch with just this patch on top of the dts changes that the arm-soc guys can then merge towards the end of the merge cycle. If that works for you, let me know and I'll do it. Regards, Tony
