On 1/29/19 4:03 PM, thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Instead of using the Arria10 (ARM32) EDAC bindings for
Stratix10 (ARM64), create Stratix10 specific EDAC bindings
to capture architecture differences between ARM32 and ARM64.
This requires fixing the previous Stratix10 bindings.
Also add the peripheral bindings for the Stratix10.
Thor Thayer (4):
Documentation: dt: edac: Fix Stratix10 IRQ bindings
Documentation: dt: edac: Add Stratix10 Peripheral bindings
EDAC, altera: Skip DB IRQ for Stratix10
arm64: dts: stratix10: Use new Stratix10 EDAC bindings
.../devicetree/bindings/edac/socfpga-eccmgr.txt | 129 +++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi | 25 ++--
drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 31 ++---
3 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Abandoning this review. As Dinh suggested, there are a few places
I can use the Stratix10 compatibles to make the code cleaner (although a
few socfpga_is_a10() calls will remain where it makes sense).
I'll resubmit a new version with more Stratix10 compatibles.
