On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 10:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 14/02/2019 05:42, Jitao Shi wrote:
> > MT8183 dsi has two changes with mt8173.
> > 1. Add the register double buffer control, but we no need it, So make
> > it default off.
> > 2. Add picture size control.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > index 80db02a25cb0..20cb53f05d42 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
> > #define DSI_VBP_NL 0x24
> > #define DSI_VFP_NL 0x28
> > #define DSI_VACT_NL 0x2C
> > +#define DSI_SIZE_CON 0x38
> > #define DSI_HSA_WC 0x50
> > #define DSI_HBP_WC 0x54
> > #define DSI_HFP_WC 0x58
> > @@ -131,7 +132,10 @@
> > #define VM_CMD_EN BIT(0)
> > #define TS_VFP_EN BIT(5)
> >
> > -#define DSI_CMDQ0 0x180
> > +#define DSI_SHADOW_DEBUG 0x190U
> > +#define FORCE_COMMIT BIT(0)
> > +#define BYPASS_SHADOW BIT(1)
> > +
> > #define CONFIG (0xff << 0)
> > #define SHORT_PACKET 0
> > #define LONG_PACKET 2
> > @@ -158,6 +162,7 @@ struct phy;
> >
> > struct mtk_dsi_driver_data {
> > const u32 reg_cmdq_off;
> > + bool has_size_ctl;
> > };
> >
> > struct mtk_dsi {
> > @@ -426,6 +431,9 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > writel(vm->vfront_porch, dsi->regs + DSI_VFP_NL);
> > writel(vm->vactive, dsi->regs + DSI_VACT_NL);
> >
> > + if (dsi->driver_data->has_size_ctl)
> > + writel(vm->vactive << 16 | vm->hactive, dsi->regs + DSI_SIZE_CON);
> > +
> > horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
> >
> > if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)
> > @@ -595,6 +603,9 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > }
> >
> > mtk_dsi_enable(dsi);
> > +
> > + /* DSI no need this double buffer, disable it when writing register */
> > + writel(FORCE_COMMIT | BYPASS_SHADOW, dsi->regs + DSI_SHADOW_DEBUG);
>
> Is this a mt8183 thing? Did you assure that this does not introduce regressions
> on other SoCs, or does it fix any?
>
> I think this should be a independent patch. If it fixes an actual issue, then
> please provide a fixes tag in that patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Matthias
>
Yes, this is for mt8183. But this reg is reverse on other mtk soc.
It is unsuitable. And i'll put it in mt8183 driver data next version.
Best Regards
Jitao
> > mtk_dsi_reset_engine(dsi);
> > mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(dsi);
> >
> > @@ -1090,11 +1101,18 @@ static const struct mtk_dsi_driver_data mt2701_dsi_driver_data = {
> > .reg_cmdq_off = 0x180,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_dsi_driver_data mt8183_dsi_driver_data = {
> > + .reg_cmdq_off = 0x200,
> > + .has_size_ctl = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id mtk_dsi_of_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-dsi",
> > .data = &mt2701_dsi_driver_data },
> > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-dsi",
> > .data = &mt8173_dsi_driver_data },
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-dsi",
> > + .data = &mt8183_dsi_driver_data },
> > { },
> > };
> >
> >
