On 13.02.2019 05:25, Florian Fainelli wrote:
BCM5301X has 3 Ethernet controllers: GMAC0, 1, 2 which map to ports 5, 7
and 8 respectively of the internal switch. Future changes will turn on
management mode in the Ethernet switch driver (b53) which will require
us to use port 8.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
index 3fced3b7f1a8..affa9cc7422d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts
@@ -150,10 +150,15 @@
label = "wan";
};
- port@5 {
- reg = <5>;
+ port@8 {
+ reg = <8>;
label = "cpu";
- ethernet = <&gmac0>;
+ ethernet = <&gmac2>;
+
+ fixed-link {
+ speed = <1000>;
+ full-duplex;
+ };
};
};
};
I'm not exactly sure how Linux switch driver works, but from DT
perspective I think we should rather have *hardware* described instead
of a common Linux case.
If I'm right, we should rather have all 3 switch ports described (5, 7,
8) and have Linux just use the one it needs.