Re: [RFC v7 0/5] pstore/block: new support logger for block devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-02-13 04:54, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 4:06 AM liaoweixiong
> <liaoweixiong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Why should we need pstore_block?
>> 1. Most embedded intelligent equipment have no persistent ram, which
>> increases costs. We perfer to cheaper solutions, like block devices.
>> In fast, there is already a sample for block device logger in driver
>> MTD (drivers/mtd/mtdoops.c).
>> 2. Do not any equipment have battery, which means that it lost all data
>> on general ram if power failure. Pstore has little to do for these
>> equipments.
>>
>> [PATCH v7]
>> On patch 1:
>> 1. Fix line over 80 characters.
>> On patch 2:
>> 1. Insert a separate patch for DT bindings.
> 
> This is looking good. Can you address the DT bindings review concerns,
> and send a v8?
> 

Sure. I had little time to send patches as i caught up with the Spring
Festival some days ago, the most grand festival of China. I'll do it
before this weekend, which is already in my plan.

> Thanks!
> 

-- 
liaoweixiong



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux