Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] of: fix kmemleak crash caused by imbalance in early memory reservation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:47 AM Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2019 15:37, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 3.15+
> > Fixes: 3f0c820664483 ("drivers: of: add initialization code for dynamic reserved memory")
> > Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Prateek Patel <prpatel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Resend with DT CCed to reach robh's patch queue
> > I added CC: stable, Fixes, and Prateek's ack
> > Trim recipients list to minimize inconvenience
>
> Mike, Stephen,
>
> I'm confused over commit 3532b3b554a216f30edb841d29eef48521bdc592 in linux-next
> "memblock: drop __memblock_alloc_base()"
>
> It's definitely going to conflict with the proposed patch
> over drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
>
> Rob, what's the next step then?

Rebase it on top of what's in linux-next and apply it to the tree
which has the above dependency. I'm guessing that is Andrew Morton's
tree.

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux